It was raining all morning and as I walked through the hordes of pushy umbrella-toting businesspeople I thought this:
- I am moving out of the way for them.
- They do not appear to see me at all.
- Do they think moving out of the way for me is an inconvenience?
- Or does the idea not even cross their mind?
I value altruism. In fact, I put altruism on a pedestal, and believe it to be one of my higher priorities. I understand that as others are different varieties of human beings, others may not value it as I do. I accept that it might not be a priority. Moreover, many people go about their days and lives without letting an altruistic thought pass through their minds. And if a thought does, then they might even acknowledge that the resulting action could be the “right” thing to do, but decides that altruism is inconvenient and a wasted effort. This directly goes against what I believe in but if I claim to value diversity in human personality then I must accept this, even if I don’t necessarily like it.
So why does lack of altruism in others bother me?
If I am truly altruistic (which nobody is; everyone is at least a little bit selfish) and truly interested in doing good for others and for benevolence’s own sake, without any motive or endgame of my own, then my own altruism should be enough for me.
It’s not enough. I expect others to value it as I do—the favors, the manners, the politeness, the simple acts that require minimal effort. It’s unrealistic, but I’m an idealist, dammit. So then I wonder why I want people to be altruistic as much as I do. One explanation could be that because I give unto others I expect reciprocation. Well that by definition is not altruism; this is “I’ll scratch your back, you scratch mine.” I refuse to believe that altruism can be reduced to give and take.
So then I wonder if I want people to be altruistic because it makes the people I come into contact with (friends, acquaintances, waitpeople, family) more pleasant. But wait, isn’t that a selfish motive too? If the people I come into contact with have been positively affected by altruism, then it’s easier for me to deal with them: again, a selfish definition that brings it back to me.
So is selfishness the opposite of altruism? I suppose not. I’ve demonstrated that selfishness can inspire altruism, in the broadest sense of the term. But if altruism is spurred by selfish motives then it isn’t altruistic by definition, right? Is altruism defined by its motives? Does it matter to the giver or the recipient? Does that make it moral or not?
I like to think that my altruism is borne of emotional attachment and caring for humanity. But maybe altruism is best regarded as a logical adherence to duty. This forces me to swallow my pride and agree with Kant (never thought I’d say that). Kant thinks that the highest pursuit in life is fulfillment of duty free of passion, sympathy, pity, and empathy. I scoffed at this idea at first. I thought that if an act of altruism doesn’t tap into one’s emotions then it lacks meaning. Now I’m not so sure. Though I feel all of the aforementioned emotions (I am still an INFJ, of course), if my sense of altruism depended on those things alone, then I would have stopped a long time ago. The world is too cold to depend on emotion as altruism’s sole motive.
So now I agree with Kant. I am logical in my altruism. I feel a duty to humankind and to serve it. This duty is free from emotion at its core, though it is undoubtedly embellished with feelings. Emotion may be present, but it is not the driving force. It’s deep, inherent drive to use my gifts for something.
And this is how I came to the (perhaps half-baked) conclusion that I will be a therapist. This may seem hasty, but it hit me all of a sudden that this (or a similar career) is probably what I’m meant to do. It didn’t hit me with a fanfare of passion, it hit me as a logical realization that this may be what I was born to do. It is my duty to myself, to my gifts, to my existence, and to whatever form of God is out there. I have this odd clarity that I rarely feel, one that can only be found at the end of an extremely introspective, intuitive day where I couldn’t stop my mind from going off on a million tangents to something fascinating and meaningful at every turn. And now, after a full day of following my brain down the rabbit hole in so many places (I had to write a list of “Things to Think About Later” because I was too busy writing all of these altruism ramblings down), I have a sense of purely rational duty to humanity and just how I will execute that.
That is all.